Skip to main content

The Fed and SVB

By quickly ring-fencing SVB and saving depositors, the Fed showed it is becoming more of a learning organization. Combined with its excellent performance managing the worst inflation spike in 40 years, instigated by the worst pandemic in 100 years, the Fed demonstrated an ability to quickly adjust when circumstances demand flexibility. This is new behavior.

To build on this and to show that it has truly committed to new behavior, the Fed will have to accomplish a few more tasks. Given the behavior of SVB management in the period leading up to the crisis, with the CEO selling $4 million in stock on or around February 28th just weeks before his bank collapsed, an effort to claw back the proceeds of any stock sale taking place less than 60 days before the collapse should be initiated.

News reports also indicate that management received bonuses in the days leading up to the collapse. These should be clawed back, too.

Further, one key to the collapse was a run on the bank accelerated by certain key influencers and advisors, specifically Peter Theil and his Founders Fund. A complete investigation of this situation should be undertaken, with Mr. Theil being held accountable and forced to repay the Treasury for any damage caused by his role in the bank run.

Finally, this is a fast-moving situation, with consequences and impacts that have yet to be fully understood. We believe the failure of SVB has significant implications for the US defense industry. Artificial Intelligence (AI), autonomous fighting vehicles, and other important technologies are being developed by tech firms affiliated with or customers of the bank. In the UK, HSBC acquired SVB's British unit for £1. Note that HSBC originally stood for the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, meaning the bank is now Chinese. Giving a Chinese bank insider access to critical defense related technologies is shortsighted and dangerous. Having the US pay, via guarantees and subsidies that make SVB’s depositors whole, is foolish.

Popular posts from this blog

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe


The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) is a law passed by the 117th United States Congress in August 2022. It "includes a first-time provision that would allow the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to negotiate prices of certain prescription drugs in Medicare and Medicaid. Savings would be generated by requiring drug manufacturers to pay a rebate for drugs whose prices increase faster than inflation under Medicare, and would create several reforms in the Medicare drug program, also known as Part D, including a cap on out-of-pocket drug spending for seniors beginning in 2025. It also extends by three years the expanded and enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credit ahead of planned premium increases set to take effect in 2023." We estimate the impact on the African American community to be significant, on the order of 8% of the total. (For a detailed analysis, email The law's climate provisions consist of "subsidies for energy that

Fixing Abortion And Black Maternal Mortality Is NOT Up To the Supreme Court. It's Up to the Fed...

Black women die in childbirth at disproportionate rates compared to their white counterparts. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clearly shows that social determinants - access to nutrition, transportation, and healthcare——are crucial factors. With the decision to restrict access to birth control and care, the Supreme Court imposed additional penalties on a selected portion of the US population - Black women. They were added without due process or a trial at the individual level. These elevated risks are clear and undeniable, as explained below. Assume two population groups or sectors. In Sector One, women die in childbirth at the rate of ten per 1,000 live births. In Sector Two, the maternal mortality rate is 100 per 1,000 live births. With the elimination of birth control, there are 2,000 live births in each sector. This implies 20 Sector One deaths and 200 in Sector Two. Amanda Stevenson, a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder,