Skip to main content

Fixing Abortion And Black Maternal Mortality Is NOT Up To the Supreme Court. It's Up to the Fed...

Black women die in childbirth at disproportionate rates compared to their white counterparts. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clearly shows that social determinants - access to nutrition, transportation, and healthcare——are crucial factors.

With the decision to restrict access to birth control and care, the Supreme Court imposed additional penalties on a selected portion of the US population - Black women. They were added without due process or a trial at the individual level. These elevated risks are clear and undeniable, as explained below.

Assume two population groups or sectors. In Sector One, women die in childbirth at the rate of ten per 1,000 live births. In Sector Two, the maternal mortality rate is 100 per 1,000 live births. With the elimination of birth control, there are 2,000 live births in each sector. This implies 20 Sector One deaths and 200 in Sector Two.

Amanda Stevenson, a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, explains that abortion, with 4 deaths per 1,000.000 procedures, is safer than  pregnancy, with 200 deaths per 1,000.000 live births in 2019.

The policy change results in 10 additional deaths in Sector One and 100 additional deaths in Sector Two. These are significant additional risks, imposed on persons with a medical condition - having a child. Not only has this added risk has been imposed without consent, it may be a violation of both the equal protection and due process clauses of the US Constitution. (Given the known differential in birth outcomes, equal protection is absent. Due process is absent because group members who die in childbirth are condemned to do so without a trial.)

We believe this decision supports an immediate, national effort to equalize maternal mortality risks across populations. High social impact investments designed to facilitate the creation of technology-based monitoring and health care delivery systems designed to reduce the risk of Black maternal mortality are one possible solution.

According to market research firm CBINSIGHTS, “Digital health investment around the world hit an all-time high of $57.2 billion in funding in 2021...” Few, if any, of these dollars went to address Black maternal mortality. (We have been researching the sector, however, and recognize increasing levels of activity (see, for example, virtual obstetric care platform Babyscripts and maternity coaching firm Mahmee).  We will release our definitive study on the space soon.)

We believe the Federal Reserve, under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act, should be the primary participant in the Maternal Mortality Reparation Facility for Black Women. We note that the Fed spent $2 trillion supporting large non-minority financial institutions.

The facility we have proposed is tied to real time monitoring systems that vector resources to pregnant Black women in a just-in-time manner. Given our forecast that the added focus on the sector will generate revenue from public and private sources, we also expect returns in this sector to be abnormally high.

The Maternal Mortality Reparation Facility for Black Women, created with the goal of reducing Black women's maternal mortality, will facilitate access to food and nutrition, transportation, housing, and healthcare. Providing critical resources needed by Black women in childbirth will save lives that should never have been at risk of loss in the first place. 

After all, you cannot claim Black Lives Matter if you damage the one group responsible for creating them.

Get Bitcoin at https://etoro.tw/3O7fFeW

Popular posts from this blog

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart of

BRICS Summit 2023: Navigating the Transformation of Global Finance

Recent developments in the global financial landscape have captured the attention of the finance world, promising a new era of integration, transformation, and collaboration. Amidst the excitement, however, it is essential to acknowledge the formidable obstacles that stand in the way of realizing these ambitions. The 2023 BRICS Summit , slated to convene amidst this shifting landscape, is poised to be a significant juncture that could have profound implications for the future of international finance. The resurgence of Bitcoin, marked by an impressive, if smaller, year-to-date price surge, has underscored its enduring relevance. Similar concerns surround the exploration of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The UK's digital pound initiative, while forward-looking, raises questions about stability, security, and privacy and potential economic power imbalances. The notion of a BRICS digital currency, potentially extended to include several countries, reflects a desire to chall

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe