Skip to main content

COP27: Compensation for developing countries due to climate change damage. Jeongmin Yoon, ESG Intern, American University.

 

 Sameh Shoukry, president of the COP27 climate summit, receives a standing ovation following a speech during the closing plenary session at the U.N. Climate Summit, Sunday, Nov. 20, 2022, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

At the 27th General Assembly of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27), the creation of a fund to compensate developing countries for "loss and damage" due to climate change was approved.

COP27 closed on the 20th of November (local time) after adopting the final agreement, the "Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan," two days after the original closing date. The general meeting was held in Egypt on the African continent, which has been severely damaged by global warming (extreme drought), factors like "adaptation" and "loss and damage" were discussed as the biggest issues between developed and developing countries. At the general meeting, developing countries demanded greater responsibility from developed countries that have emitted huge amounts of greenhouse gases in the process of industrialization. This is because climate-related damage, like rising sea levels, is increasing rapidly in underdeveloped countries. These countries are less infrastructure intensive than advanced countries, and climate damage impacts them even more.  In particular, a resolution calling for compensating countries by financing "loss and damage" caused by climate change was adopted for the first time in 30 years. This had not occurred since the UNFCCC was adopted, and after fierce negotiations throughout the 27th general meeting, it agreed to establish a fund for the most vulnerable countries.

According to a report released in June, 55 countries most vulnerable to climate change suffered $525 billion (about 705 trillion won) in damage from climate disasters over the past 20 years. Some studies estimate that this will reach $580 billion by 2030. In addition, the cost of responding to climate change in developing countries will increase, exceeding 3,000 trillion won per year by 2030. The report estimates that the investment needed to enable developing countries around the world to exit fossil fuels and respond to extreme climate change will be $1 trillion (about 1,388 trillion won) in 2025 and $2.4 trillion (about 3,330 trillion) in 2030.

From developed countries to developing countries, compensating losses and damages, detailing the kind of damage compensated for in the future, detailing exactly who will pay the compensation, and in what way are the next steps expected to materialize. As of today, no clear discussion of compensation has been released yet, and the U.S. drew a line by stating clearly that they were not agreeing to an obligation but, rather, agreeing to provide assistance on the social dimension. I think agreeing to provide ANY compensations was of great significance, and am please that compensation for developing countries due to global warming has been adopted on the agenda, but I wonder how much actual compensation will reach developing countries. I think it will be necessary to continue to think and talk about about climate issues and to pay close attention to further compensation mechanics to make this agreement effective.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...