Skip to main content

Climate Change: Young vs Old. Gregory Savioz-Buck, ESG/Impact Investing Intern

It's easy to see that right now, whether it's in politics or in the environment, there is a gap between the visions of the youth and older people. This is not a new phenomenon: these groups have always had different ideas and seen the world differently. However, with all that is going on in our time (climate change and political polarization), these two sets of vision generale some problems. Take climate change for example. There is a clear disconnection between what young people and old people think.

Let me explain: young people tend to see the consequences of climate change. This is normal, since they are the ones who will live with these consequences. On the other hand, older people see global warming as less of a problem and tend to be more concerned with a problem closer to them, the economy. They overestimate the importance of the economy to the point of making it a more important than the environment and climate change. This is curious, because usually it is young people who tend to take more risks. But, older people are now the ones taking environmental risks. By not putting the appropriate emphasis on climate change, they are risking suffering thru environmental incidents, like floods. They will not necessarily be the ones who will have to live long term with these risks, but the risks are present now anyway. Of course, the consequences of environmental neglect will be fully experienced by the next generations. It seems to me that the situations are reversed, with young people wanting environmental security and normalcy, they do not want to take risks with the environment. This is a big change. 

Young people might see climate change from a lending perspective. The environment is like a  loan that each generation borrows from the prior generation, at least until they come of age and are able to be responsible for and manage risks. Young people don't know yet if it is a good loan or a bad loan, because it has was a loan taken out a long time ago. We don't know yet if it is a profitable proposition. We simply don't know yet the result. There might be a positive outcome if it is a good loan (e.g. the North Pole does not melt), but there could also be serious consequences if it is a bad loan (e.g. global warming, disappearance of some species, etc.). While young people generally tend to underestimate risk, they do not do so in this case, for this loan on the planet. 

For generations, human actions have led to increasing pollution and global warming. We are at a critical point, perhaps at year 0 of the last loan of the planet. We are trying to determine if this is a good or bad loan, that is, if we will have an environment that is similar to the one inherited by the older generation when they took over responsibility for the environment from their elders. The outcome depends on what we do now. 

The disconnection between the young and old has major impacts on the fate of the planet and its inhabitants. We must find a way to make the older generations understand the risk of climate change. One way to do this is might be to link the economy to climate change.

Popular posts from this blog

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe

SUMMARY: THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) is a law passed by the 117th United States Congress in August 2022. It "includes a first-time provision that would allow the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to negotiate prices of certain prescription drugs in Medicare and Medicaid. Savings would be generated by requiring drug manufacturers to pay a rebate for drugs whose prices increase faster than inflation under Medicare, and would create several reforms in the Medicare drug program, also known as Part D, including a cap on out-of-pocket drug spending for seniors beginning in 2025. It also extends by three years the expanded and enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credit ahead of planned premium increases set to take effect in 2023." We estimate the impact on the African American community to be significant, on the order of 8% of the total. (For a detailed analysis, email info@creativeinvest.com). The law's climate provisions consist of "subsidies for energy that

March FOMC Minutes: Federal Reserve Policy Errors Continue

We note that, according to the minutes of the March 15-16 2022 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, the Federal Reserve Board "reached consensus..that they would begin reducing the central bank balance sheet by $95 billion a month, likely beginning in May. There also were strong indications that half-percentage point, or 50 basis point, interest rate increases are ahead." This action is consistent with past policy errors: on July 15, 2015, Janet Yellen, then Chair of the Federal Reserve stated that "the Fed's concerns about inflation limit its ability to address high African-American unemployment."  This is indicative of the continuing inability of Fed policy makers to successfully balance social and financial policy when social policy goals do not serve the interest of non-minority, non-wealthy populations. As the Fed itself noted "the..balance sheet has grown to $8.9 trillion from $8.1 trillion in July, reflecting continued net asset purchases of