Skip to main content

The Trumpsqueeze: Higher Prices, Higher Interest Rates, Fewer Jobs

The U.S. economy is entering a difficult phase that deserves its own name: the Trumpsqueeze.

The Trumpsqueeze describes an economy in which households and businesses are simultaneously pressured by elevated prices, high borrowing costs, slower employment growth, and weakening wage momentum. It is not exactly stagflation. Economic output can still grow. Corporate profits can remain strong. Financial markets can even rise. But underneath those headline numbers, consumers and smaller businesses can find themselves increasingly squeezed.

For Black and minority-owned businesses, that squeeze can be even more severe.

What is the Trumpsqueeze?

The Trumpsqueeze can be summarized as:

Higher operating costs + higher borrowing costs + slower hiring and wage growth = shrinking economic room to maneuver.

The latest data illustrate the problem.

The U.S. economy added only 29,000 jobs in September 2026, while the unemployment rate increased to 4.2%. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also revised July and August payroll growth downward by a combined 60,000 jobs. Average hourly earnings increased only 0.1% during September and 3.0% over the past year.

Meanwhile, inflation remains elevated. The most recent Consumer Price Index showed prices rising 0.4% in August and 3.4% over the previous 12 months. Gasoline prices jumped 3.9% during the month, while energy prices increased 2.1%.

That creates an important problem: recent wage growth is no longer keeping pace with headline inflation.

At the same time, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds target range by 25 basis points in September to 3.75%–4.00%, explicitly citing elevated inflation.

Workers are therefore facing slower income growth while consumers and businesses continue to encounter elevated prices and expensive credit.

That is the Trumpsqueeze.

The Labor Market Is Sending a Warning

September's employment report may be the clearest warning so far.

Payroll employment increased by just 29,000 jobs, substantially below the pace needed to create confidence in sustained labor-market expansion. Even more concerning, previously reported employment gains continue to be revised downward. July employment was revised from a gain of 21,000 jobs to a loss of 10,000, while August was revised from 162,000 to 133,000.

These revisions support our continuing concern that initial employment releases can present an economy that appears stronger than it ultimately proves to be.

The deterioration is especially troubling for Black workers.

Black unemployment rose from 6.0% in August to 7.0% in September, compared with only 3.6% for White workers. Black women's unemployment increased particularly sharply, from 5.9% to 7.3%.

Historically, weakening conditions often become visible in Black employment before they become obvious in headline national statistics.

Why Trump's Policies Matter

The Trumpsqueeze is not attributable to any single policy, and inflation, interest rates and employment reflect forces extending well beyond the White House.

But several Trump administration policies may be intensifying the pressure.

Tariffs can increase the cost of imported goods, components and raw materials. Restrictive immigration policies may reduce labor availability in industries such as construction, agriculture, hospitality and services. Anti-DEI and anti-supplier-diversity policies can reduce contracting opportunities for businesses that already face capital and market-access barriers.

At the same time, fiscal stimulus and trade restrictions can sustain inflationary pressure, leaving the Federal Reserve with less room to reduce interest rates.

This produces an unusual policy loop:

Tariffs and other cost pressures contribute to inflation → inflation encourages higher interest rates → higher rates restrict credit and investment → weaker investment slows hiring → slower hiring weakens household income.

Businesses then face weaker customers at precisely the moment their own financing and operating costs are elevated.

Minority Businesses Face a More Severe Squeeze

For large corporations with significant cash balances and access to bond markets, higher interest rates may be manageable.

For many Black and minority-owned businesses, they are not.

These firms tend to have less accumulated capital, smaller banking relationships and greater reliance on bank loans, credit cards, personal credit and other relatively expensive financing sources.

A Federal Funds rate of 3.75%–4.00% does not mean that a minority business can borrow at 4%.

Actual small-business borrowing costs may be several percentage points higher after bank spreads, credit risk, collateral requirements, fees and borrower-specific factors are incorporated.

The result is a widening divide between businesses able to finance expansion internally and those required to borrow.

Consider a minority-owned construction company. It may simultaneously face:

  • higher materials and insurance costs;

  • more expensive working-capital financing;

  • slower government or corporate contracting opportunities;

  • difficulty hiring skilled employees;

  • customers delaying projects because their own financing costs have increased.

A restaurant or retail business may face the same basic equation: higher food, energy and inventory costs while customers increasingly become price-sensitive.

The Trumpsqueeze therefore operates from both sides of the income statement.

Costs rise while revenue becomes harder to generate.

Strong GDP Does Not Mean Everyone Is Doing Well

This is also why headline GDP figures should be interpreted carefully.

An economy can report respectable GDP growth while economic stress becomes concentrated among smaller firms, renters, borrowers, younger workers and minority communities.

Large corporate capital expenditures—particularly investments related to artificial intelligence, data centers and technology—can support aggregate growth while masking weakness elsewhere.

That produces what might be called a two-speed economy.

At the top are companies with cash, technology, pricing power and access to capital.

At the bottom are businesses and households paying more for credit, energy, housing and basic goods while income growth slows.

The national average sits somewhere between these two experiences and therefore may accurately describe neither.

The Black Unemployment Rate Deserves Special Attention

The increase in Black unemployment to 7.0% should not be treated as a minor demographic detail inside the employment report.

It may be an early economic warning signal.

Black workers have historically been among the first groups affected when employers become cautious about hiring and among the last to benefit fully during recoveries.

The September numbers therefore suggest that the Trumpsqueeze may already be transitioning from a cost-of-living problem into a broader employment problem.

If hiring continues to weaken while inflation remains above the Federal Reserve's 2% target, policymakers will face an increasingly uncomfortable tradeoff.

Cut rates too quickly and inflation could accelerate again.

Keep rates high and employment and small-business activity may deteriorate further.

What Comes Next

Several indicators deserve close monitoring during the remainder of 2026:

Employment revisions. Continued downward revisions would confirm that labor-market weakness began earlier than headline releases initially indicated.

Black unemployment. Another significant increase would provide evidence that labor-market deterioration is broadening.

Inflation. September CPI data are scheduled for release on October 14.

Interest rates. The Fed must determine whether persistent inflation requires maintaining or raising rates even as hiring weakens.

Small-business credit. Rising delinquencies, tighter underwriting or declining loan approvals could turn the Trumpsqueeze into a genuine small-business contraction.

Supplier diversity and federal contracting. Continued reductions in opportunities for minority firms could magnify the impact of weaker private-sector demand.

Trumpsqueeze Is Not Yet Stagflation—but the Direction Is Concerning

Traditional stagflation describes high inflation accompanied by stagnant growth and high unemployment.

We are not there yet.

The Trumpsqueeze describes something slightly different and potentially more politically important: an economy that may look reasonably healthy in aggregate while becoming increasingly difficult to navigate at the household and small-business level.

GDP can grow while entrepreneurs feel poorer.

Corporate profits can rise while small-business margins shrink.

Employment can technically increase while Black unemployment surges.

Inflation can decline from previous peaks while prices remain painfully high.

And interest rates can appear moderate historically while remaining extremely expensive for businesses without easy access to capital.

That combination is increasingly defining the 2026 economy.

For Black and minority-owned businesses especially, the message is straightforward:

The Trumpsqueeze is not simply inflation. It is the simultaneous compression of revenue, margins, purchasing power and access to capital.

If current trends continue, the most important economic question heading into 2027 may no longer be whether the U.S. economy is technically expanding.

It may be who is actually benefiting from that expansion—and who is being squeezed out of it.

Popular posts from this blog

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe...

The $40 Trillion Debt Crisis Was a Choice — and Black America Will Pay a Disproportionate Price

The United States has now crossed a fiscal threshold that once seemed unimaginable: federal debt exceeds $40 trillion .  Reuters reports that approximately $32.3 trillion is debt held by the public , with another roughly $7.8 trillion in intragovernmental holdings . It also reports that federal debt has increased by approximately $11.6 trillion during Donald Trump's two terms to date . For decades, Republican fiscal policy has combined large tax cuts with continued federal spending and then used the resulting deficits to justify demands for reductions in domestic programs. That pattern stretches from Ronald Reagan through George W. Bush and Donald Trump. The assertion that Republicans as a whole deliberately want the United States to default cannot be dismissed . Concerns about deliberate default strategies are not imaginary. In May 2023, Donald Trump publicly urged congressional Republicans to allow the United States to default if Democrats did not accept spending cuts. We argue...