Skip to main content

The Question of AI Regulation – Rohan Sivakumar University of Chicago, Gabriel Philipp, Siena University

 At 10:00 am on 7/30/25, the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment convened a panel of three industry experts to gain clarity on the best path forward in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI). 

All three witnesses provided an optimistic view of AI, particularly in its widespread integration and adoption by American industries. Apart from a few questions from Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) regarding the impact of the current administration’s attitude towards climate change on the insurance industry, the hearing was largely apolitical. 

Throughout the hearing, there was a significant emphasis on how AI can be developed safely and in ways that benefit the population over corporate enterprises. There was a reference to a speech given by Geoffrey Hinton, 2024 Nobel Physics Prize winner, warning about the future of AI development. He points out within his speech that AI has two ways it could be developed. It could be a tool that will help solve and support some of the world's biggest issues, or we could develop it to maximize profit, which will eventually lead to AI developing systems that ignore the needs of the people. A message that was reciprocated throughout the hearing, as multiple senators talked about how AI development can solve social issues or make them worse. It displays what policymakers are thinking about when trying to regulate AI. 

There is a clear understanding that AI is the future and needs to be developed, but there have to be limitations in order to protect the safety of the government and protection of the people. Senator Britt (R-AL) likened the emergence of AI to that of social media and urged for regulation, as the lack thereof regarding social media has led to massive negative consequences, particularly on the youngest generation. 

While there was not much by way of creating a regulatory framework, what senators and witnesses seemed to agree on was the need for a public-private regulatory body for AI adoption, particularly in capital markets. Ranking Member Warner (D-VA) emphasized this in his questioning of Nasdaq President Tal Cohen. Moreover, President Cohen warned against state-level AI regulation, as he believed it would hamper AI innovation and promote regulatory arbitrage, leaving localities and the US at a disadvantage on the national and global scale, respectively. 

How are we seeing this sentiment reflected in legislation? The White House recently issued an ‘AI Action Plan’, which ostensibly has a focus on AI innovation and infrastructure. The Senate Bill potentially being drafted will likely accord with the plan, creating loose guardrails that, hopefully, promote innovation responsibly. 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...
Read more

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...
Read more

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...
Read more