Skip to main content

Trump's assaults on the Federal Reserve's independence must cease. BankThink - American Banker Newspaper.

At a July 8 cabinet meeting, President Donald Trump launched a fresh barrage of attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell over his handling of interest rates, claiming Trump's team could "do a better job than him," accusing Powell of lying to Congress and calling for his resignation.

The president even suggested that Powell acted to benefit the Biden-Harris campaign by speeding up rate cuts under Trump's predecessor, and slow-walking them now. "He's always late with me, not with Biden," Trump said, implying that Powell's monetary policy decision-making was politically motivated.

The truth is as follows: Mr. Powell has a documented history of nonpartisan behavior when it comes to monetary policy, most recently displayed on June 24th during testimony before the House Financial Services Committee. Maintaining a nonpartisan stance, the Fed chair refused to make any comments about either Trump or the administration's fiscal policy.

Of course, this is not the first time President Trump has attempted to strong-arm Powell into aligning with his political agenda. Earlier this month, Trump demanded Powell's resignation — echoing allegations by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte that Powell lied to Congress about the Federal Reserve's headquarters renovation. This baseless allegation should alarm every American who values a stable, predictable monetary system.

This is not a disagreement over renovations. It's about the independence of the Federal Reserve, an institution deliberately insulated from day-to-day political pressure so it can make decisions in the best interest of the nation's long-term economic health. But the most recent accusations — unfounded and dangerous — pose a more immediate threat to one of the cornerstones of America's economic governance: the independence of the Federal Reserve.

History teaches that when central banks fall under political control, the consequences are severe. Hyperinflation, currency devaluation and economic crises are common outcomes in countries where politicians dictate monetary policy. A central bank must sometimes make unpopular decisions — such as raising interest rates to combat inflation — that elected officials might oppose in the short run but are necessary to safeguard the economy's long-term stability.

Allowing political leaders to remove the Fed chair over policy disagreements or exaggerated allegations undermines confidence in the economy. Investors, businesses and consumers all rely on a predictable and credible monetary authority. Without that, financial markets become volatile, borrowing costs rise unpredictably and economic growth falters.

Powell's record deserves recognition, not condemnation. Under his leadership, the Federal Reserve has taken unprecedented steps to understand and address economic disparities. The Fed's emphasis on maximum employment has extended the benefits of economic growth to communities traditionally left behind, including low-income households and minority workers. Powell has repeatedly underscored the importance of inclusive economic growth. With the recent spike in Black unemployment, this expertise is sorely needed. 

Moreover, under Powell's tenure, the Fed helped stabilize the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic, a pandemic made worse due to incompetent executive branch actions. Powell's swift, decisive actions protected millions of jobs and businesses — particularly in vulnerable communities. His leadership demonstrated a clear commitment to ensuring that monetary policy supports broad-based economic opportunity.

The allegations surrounding building renovations, even if sincerely held by Powell's critics, do not rise to the level of misconduct warranting removal. Congressional oversight of the Fed is appropriate and necessary, but using oversight as a political cudgel threatens the institutional integrity that makes the U.S. financial system the envy of the world.

Calls for Powell's resignation over spurious charges signal an effort to intimidate the Fed into political compliance. That is a line we must not cross. The Fed must remain free to pursue price stability and maximum employment based on rigorous analysis — not partisan agendas.

At this critical juncture for the U.S. economy, with inflation pressures moderating and employment gains continuing, undermining confidence in the Federal Reserve would be profoundly destabilizing. We should reject attempts to politicize the Fed and reaffirm our commitment to an independent central bank — one that can act in the nation's best interest, even when doing so is politically inconvenient.

For the sake of economic stability, prosperity, and fairness, Jerome Powell should remain at the helm of the Federal Reserve.

The author would like to acknowledge input from his student interns: Rohan Sivakumar (University of Chicago), Connor Stout (Denison University Ohio) Dylan Unruh (Dartmouth College) and Gabriel Philipp (Siena College)

NOTE: Edited version published at: https://www.americanbanker.com/opinion/trumps-assaults-on-the-federal-reserves-independence-must-cease

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...