This summer,
my partner and I decided to travel across Europe, using only trains to reduce
our environmental impact. For several years now, I’ve struggled with flying due
to its significant pollution. However, I am a passionate traveler, so I’ve been
looking for ways to continue exploring while minimizing my carbon footprint. As
we considered more sustainable travel options, we concluded that utilizing the
European rail network—superior in quality compared to the American system—was
the best solution. The two images below show the American and European rail
networks, clearly illustrating that the European network offers far more
choices.
Here is the
itinerary we followed in the summer of 2024. To get to Europe, we had no choice
but to fly. Our flight departed from Boston and landed in Amsterdam, with a
layover in Iceland. However, once in Europe, we traveled exclusively by train:
Amsterdam (Netherlands), Warsaw (Poland), Krakow (Poland), Prague (Czech
Republic), Bratislava (Slovakia), Kosice (Slovakia), Budapest (Hungary), Vienna
(Austria), and Sion (Switzerland).
Taking the
train is certainly slower than flying, but it has its advantages. In fact, when
you consider it, traveling by train isn't much longer than flying, because you
don't need to arrive 2 or 3 hours in advance—10 to 15 minutes early is usually
sufficient. Upon arriving at the train station, you simply disembark and head
to your destination. There’s no need to wait for baggage claim since your bags
are with you in the cabin. You also avoid airport security checks and customs.
Additionally, traveling by train allows you to enjoy the scenery of each
country, giving you a deeper sense of its character.
One of the
greatest benefits of traveling by train, as we experienced, is the cost. For an
itinerary like ours, spanning 9 countries over approximately 2.5 weeks, the
price of our train pass was around $400 USD per person. In comparison, a flight
between Amsterdam and Warsaw costs about $250 USD per person.
Another
significant advantage of train travel is the reduction in pollution. While the
cost of travel is important, the ecological impact of our journey has become
increasingly significant to us. Even before we departed, we calculated the
environmental impact of flying from Amsterdam to Warsaw. Here are the results:
- Ecological
impact of the Amsterdam-Warsaw flight: 0.15 tons of CO2 per person.
- Ecological
impact of the entire train itinerary: 0.02 tons of CO2 per person.
·
Source :
https://calculator.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx?tab=3
The
difference is clear. The choice seems obvious. While flying may appear to be
the easy and fast option, it requires arriving several hours early, undergoing
all the security procedures, paying more (for an itinerary like ours), and,
most importantly, causing significantly more pollution.
Flying is
sometimes necessary. However, whenever possible, taking the train is a more
eco-friendly option. In North America, the rail network is not very well
developed. Yet, many people travel and many go to Europe. This could be a great
opportunity to make a difference and try a different form of public
transportation that benefits both the planet and your wallet.
Links
To buy a global train
pass in Europe
-
https://www.eurail.com/en/eurail-passes/global-pass
To calculate the
ecological impact for every type of public transportation
-
https://calculator.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx?tab=3