Skip to main content

Canadian vs US Elections. Gregory Savioz-Buck, Impact Investing Intern


             General elections in Quebec, Canada, held every 4 years, occurred on Monday, October 3, 2022. 125 seats are available for candidates. The political party winning the election is the one that gets more than 63 seats. With this many seats, a party can govern more easily, since its party has more seats than all the opposition parties combined. In the 2018 election, the Coalition Avenir Québec (on the right side of the political spectrum) won the election handily, taking 74 of the 125 seats. During the 4 years CAQ was in power, the pandemic occurred. There was no action on environmental issues. As a young person, I am concerned about the ecological future of our planet and I believe that the environment should be the number one priority in Quebec. Unfortunately, my views do not seem to be shared by the government. For many people, the October 3rd election was important because not only is the environment in bad shape, but so are the housing, education and health care systems.

CAQ is not popular with young people under 34, since it rarely garners more than 30% support.  September 23 was the day of the climate protest. Three CAQ ministers who showed up at the Montreal protest demonstration were booed. Several young people asked them to leave, since their government was doing nothing to help the planet. On the other hand, the left-leaning Québec Solidaire (QS) party is supported by many young people. It is focused on a green and social reforms. The other opposition parties are the Parti Libéral du Québec (PLQ), the first opposition party, the Parti Québécois (PQ) party and the Parti Conservateur du Québec (PCQ).

On October 3, the CAQ won 90 seats, the PLQ 21, QS 11, the PQ 3 and the PCQ none. From my point of view, and that of many young people, these results are disappointing, since the results mean that we will have 4 more years of CAQ government and, therefore, 4 more years of environmental inaction. The favorable results for the CAQ can be attributed to "good" management during the pandemic.

The October 3 election results shocked many people. While no one has claimed the election was stolen a la Donald J. Trump, there is a distortion in popular vote mechanics that makes people unhappy. The CAQ received almost 41% of the support but won 72% of the seats. The QLP received 14.3% of the support, and won 16.8% of the seats. QS received 15.4% of the popular vote, but 8.8% of the seats. The PQ has 14.6% of the vote and 2.4% of the seats. The PCQ has 12.9% of the vote and 0% of the seats. The problem is obvious. Although CAQ had promised to reform the voting system if elected, it  did nothing, claiming that Quebecers were not interested. The October 3 results may bring the voting system debate back to the table since opposition parties are now calling on the government to reform the system,  making headlines across the province.

The CAQ won the election handily, but faces challenges, having made several major mistakes during the election campaign. Premier François Legault grumbled when opponents attacked him and was often accused of being arrogant. The immigration minister for Quebec stated 80% of the immigrants in Quebec live in Montreal, that they don't speak French, that they don't work and that they don't care about the Quebec culture. All of these statements are false. During his victory speech, winner  François Legault cited his main priorities: education, health and inflation. The environment was not one of them.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...