Skip to main content

A Young Voice for the Future: Our Amicus Brief in Lighthiser v. Trump

On September 8, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana granted our motion to file an amicus curiae brief in Lighthiser, et al. v. Trump, et al. — a case that strikes at the heart of climate justice and intergenerational equity.

This is not just another legal filing. It is a statement that the economic and health consequences of dismantling climate protections are real, measurable, and disproportionately borne by young people.

And fittingly, the brief was authored by a young leader: Connor Stout, age 20, a senior at Denison University


Why We Filed

The challenged executive orders — 14154, 14156, and 14261 — expand fossil fuel development while dismantling climate mitigation and monitoring systems. Our brief demonstrates that these actions are not only environmentally reckless, but also economically catastrophic.

EPA data shows that clean air protections prevented 230,000 premature deaths and preserved $1.8 trillion in economic value in 2020 alone. Rolling back those protections isn’t just bad science — it’s bad economics.


The Costs of Deregulation

Our brief documents how these policies create an intergenerational transfer of risk:

  • Higher healthcare costs and reduced life expectancy from air pollution.

  • Lost productivity and diminished income as illness and disasters disrupt education and work.

  • Destabilized housing and insurance markets as major insurers withdraw from climate-exposed regions.

  • Trillions in long-term damages shifted from today’s policymakers and corporations to tomorrow’s taxpayers.


Voices From the Brief

As I noted when filing: “This case is about much more than environmental policy. It is about the transfer of trillions of dollars in hidden costs from today’s decision-makers to tomorrow’s taxpayers. Young people like Connor will literally pay the price in diminished health, shortened life expectancy, lost income, and destabilized communities.”William Michael Cunningham

And from Connor, the author of the brief: “The youth of this country are not passive bystanders to the climate crisis. We are its inheritors. Deregulation mortgages our future for short-term gains, leaving young Americans to bear the costs of climate instability, weakened infrastructure, and destabilized markets.”Connor Stout


Why This Matters

The Court must understand that these harms are not hypothetical. They are happening now:

  • Asthma attacks and school days lost.

  • Families priced out of insurance in Florida, California, and Louisiana.

  • Communities facing billion-dollar disasters every year with less federal support.

Every one of these is a direct, measurable outcome of policies that put short-term profits ahead of generational justice.


Moving Forward

This amicus brief is not the end of our work — it is part of an ongoing effort to hold policymakers accountable for the true costs of deregulation.

By empowering young leaders like Connor to take a central role, we not only present the strongest possible economic case, but also make clear that the next generation refuses to remain silent while their future is bargained away.


Read More: For a copy of the brief, email us at info@creativeinvest.com.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...