Skip to main content

Tax Reform: Trajectory of Younger Generations Not Predetermined. Anas Faiq, Audencia Business School.

Sen. Bennet at Politico
Sen. Bennet, D-CO (right) at Politico 
The Politico Playbook event on tax reform brought together prominent lawmakers to debate the administration’s policies during the first 100 days. Discussions revolved around tax rates, SALT (State and Local Tax) deductions, budget cuts, and the broader implications of these measures on businesses and individuals. Key participants included Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), Representative Mike Lawler (R-NY), and Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO), each offering contrasting perspectives.

Senator Ron Johnson criticized the proposed tax reforms, stating that they primarily benefit only 5% of businesses, leaving 95% unaddressed. He advocated for budget cuts through two separate bills aimed at reducing spending by $1.5 trillion. Johnson emphasized the simplicity of the current tax code and highlighted that tariffs could raise $1 trillion in revenue. He also pointed out that since 2019, the U.S. has maintained an annual spending level of $4.6 trillion, suggesting the need for more fiscal discipline.

Representative Mike Lawler focused on the SALT deduction cap, advocating for its increase from $10,000 to $20,000. He introduced legislation to address this issue, citing the burden of property taxes on middle-class and upper-middle-class families in high tax states like New York. Lawler noted that former President Trump also supported lifting the cap as part of the broader tax reform package. Beyond the policy debate, Lawler expressed his ambition to become the next governor of New York, positioning himself as a champion of tax relief for his constituents.

Senator Michael Bennet presented a strong critique of the Republican tax proposals, arguing they overwhelmingly favor the wealthiest Americans. Bennet pointed out that 50% of the benefits would go to the top 5% of earners, with 25% going to the top 1%. He dismissed claims that tax cuts would "pay for themselves," calling the notion widely debunked. Bennet also voiced opposition to adjusting the SALT deduction, emphasizing that such a move would add another $1.2 trillion to the national deficit. He expressed concern for vulnerable populations, particularly children in underprivileged school districts, who he argued would remain “invisible” under the administration’s policies. Furthermore, he warned that current economic policies would leave young people poorer than their parents.

However, there are many factors that challenge the idea that young people are destined to be worse off than their parents. The rapid growth of the digital economy and technological advancements has created new industries and job opportunities that didn’t exist a generation ago. Globalization and remote work have made it easier for young people to access international markets, launch businesses, and adapt to changing economic conditions. Additionally, access to financial education and investment tools are more widespread, enabling young people to build wealth in innovative ways. While challenges like rising housing costs and inflation are significant, the unique opportunities available today suggest that the economic trajectory of younger generations is not necessarily predetermined.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...