Skip to main content

Why the latest CPI report isn’t the clear-cut victory some are making it out to be

But that’s not what the data actually show.

According to the official CPI report from the BLS, the overall CPI rose 2.4% over the past 12 months, after rising 2.7% in the year ending December. That is a deceleration. But it is not a decline in prices. Prices still rose everywhere consumers spend — on food, rent, medical care, and services — and in many cases remained stubbornly high (especially food, which rose nearly 3% YOY). (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Slowdown ≠ Relief at the Store

A common mistake in popular commentary is conflating “inflation slowed” with “inflation fell.”
But inflation slows when the pace of price increases decelerates — it does not mean that prices actually dropped. For most households, the cost of living is still going up. A 2.4% annual price increase means $100 worth of goods in January 2025 now costs about $102.40 — not less than before. That’s not relief; it’s erosion of purchasing power.

Meanwhile, core inflation — the measure that strips out volatile food and energy — still increased 2.5% over the year. That reflects persistent price pressures in services and essentials most families can’t avoid. 

Why This Matters for Investors (Especially “Impact” Investors)

Inflation isn’t just a macroeconomic abstraction; it affects real people — especially low- and moderate-income households — and real investments. When inflation remains elevated:

  • Consumer budgets are squeezed, meaning less discretionary spending and financial stress.

  • Real returns on investments shrink, particularly for fixed-income and social impact strategies that rely on stable consumer conditions.

  • Inequality widens, because essential price increases (housing, healthcare, food) disproportionately hit vulnerable populations.

Impact investors often work at the intersection of capital and real-world outcomes. Understanding the difference between headline narratives and household realities matters deeply when you’re evaluating where capital can do the most good. Misreading inflation as “defeated” can lull investors and policymakers into complacency — even as families still struggle to keep up with cost increases.

The Politics of Framing

It’s no secret that some political actors, including former President Donald Trump, have seized on the slight downward shift in the headline inflation figure as proof that their preferred policies worked. That framing is appealing, but it oversimplifies economic reality.

Decades of research show that inflation statistics are complex, influenced by changing price patterns across hundreds of categories. Highlighting a minor deceleration without context amounts to political cheerleading, not sober economic interpretation.

For Your Portfolio and Purpose

Impact investors should watch how narratives — like “inflation fell!” — influence markets, policy decisions, and consumer confidence. Tempestuous inflation stories can lead to:

  • premature interest rate cuts that don’t align with underlying cost pressures;

  • underestimation of cost pressures in sectors like healthcare, education, and housing;

  • misallocated capital flows chasing complacency rather than addressing structural economic inequities.

Understanding the data beneath the headlines empowers impact investors to align capital with long-term social and economic resilience, not short-term political spin.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...