Skip to main content

Loss Generated by Elimination of DEI Contracts Estimated to be $1.6 trillion.

To calculate the actual LOSS, NOT SAVINGS generated by DOGE’s elimination of DEI contracts, we must consider the broad economic and social costs associated with racial discrimination in employment, housing, health disparities, entrepreneurship barriers, and overall economic productivity. These factors create hidden costs that far exceed the reported $1 billion in so-called "savings."

1. Economic Impact of Employment Discrimination

  • Wage and Productivity Losses: Racial and gender discrimination in hiring, promotions, and wages reduces earnings and workforce productivity. A 2019 study from Citigroup estimated that racial discrimination cost the U.S. economy $16 trillion over the past two decades.

  • Labor Market Exclusion: Discrimination against Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Indigenous workers reduces overall workforce participation and lowers GDP.

  • Cost of Unemployment and Underemployment: The absence of DEI programs increases bias, making it harder for minorities to access jobs or advance. Each 1% increase in unemployment due to racial bias costs the U.S. economy at least $50 billion annually.

  • Estimated Annual Cost from Increased Employment Discrimination: $500 billion - $750 billion

2. Housing Discrimination and Economic Loss

  • Reduced Homeownership Rates: Discrimination in mortgage lending and real estate reduces homeownership rates among minority groups, exacerbating the racial wealth gap.

  • Property Value Depreciation: Segregation and discrimination devalue properties in Black and Hispanic communities. A Brookings study found that Black-owned homes are undervalued by $48,000 per home, resulting in a $156 billion cumulative loss.

  • Higher Foreclosure Rates: Discriminatory lending practices increase foreclosures, raising public costs for local governments.

  • Estimated Annual Cost from Housing Discrimination: $100 billion - $250 billion

3. Business & Entrepreneurship Losses

  • Barriers to Minority-Owned Businesses: Minority-owned businesses receive less funding and fewer contracts due to discrimination. The Department of Commerce estimated that if minority entrepreneurs had equal access to capital, the U.S. economy could generate an additional $8 trillion in GDP.

  • Reduction in Federal Procurement for Minority Firms: Cutting DEI-related government contracts shuts minority firms out of federal opportunities, reducing their ability to scale.

  • Estimated Annual Cost from Reduced Minority Business Activity: $500 billion - $800 billion

4. Healthcare Disparities & Increased Public Costs

  • Lower Access to Care: DEI programs in health agencies help reduce racial disparities in medical treatment. Without these programs, higher mortality rates, more emergency room visits, and untreated chronic illnesses increase healthcare costs.

  • Economic Productivity Losses Due to Poor Health: Discrimination-related stress, workplace bias, and reduced healthcare access cost businesses an estimated $300 billion annually.

  • Estimated Annual Cost from Health Inequities: $300 billion - $500 billion

5. Criminal Justice and Social Costs

  • Higher Incarceration Rates: Discrimination increases policing biases and wrongful incarceration of Black and Hispanic communities. The economic cost of mass incarceration is at least $182 billion per year.

  • Lost Economic Contributions: If formerly incarcerated individuals were fully reintegrated into the workforce, they could contribute $78 billion in GDP.

  • Estimated Annual Cost from Criminal Justice Disparities: $200 billion - $300 billion


TOTAL LOSS ESTIMATE FROM DOGE'S DEI CONTRACT CUTS

Economic FactorEstimated Annual Loss
Employment Discrimination$500B - $750B
Housing Discrimination$100B - $250B
Business Discrimination$500B - $800B
Health Disparities$300B - $500B
Criminal Justice Inequities$200B - $300B
Total Economic Loss$1.6 Trillion - $2.6 Trillion

This means DOGE’s so-called “savings” of $1 billion actually generate economic losses of at least $1.6 trillion per year—possibly exceeding $2.6 trillion. That’s a net economic loss of $1,600 to $2,600 for every $1 “saved.”

Eliminating DEI programs does not save money—it destroys economic growth, perpetuates inequality, and increases taxpayer burdens through rising social costs.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...