Skip to main content

Combating Redlining and Mortgage Discrimination – The Fight Continues


The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced legal actions aimed at addressing discriminatory lending practices, documenting systemic racism in the financial services industry. The cases highlight DOJ’s efforts: a $6.5 million settlement with Citadel Federal Credit Union for redlining Black and Hispanic communities, and a lawsuit against Rocket Mortgage, an appraisal management company, and an appraiser for racial discrimination in a mortgage refinance application.

These cases underline a painful truth: redlining and racial discrimination in housing and mortgage lending persist, reinforcing racial wealth disparities and undermining the economic potential of minority communities.


The Citadel Federal Credit Union Case

In the first case, the settlement with Citadel Federal Credit Union reveals a stark reality. Despite decades of laws intended to prevent it, redlining—a practice in which lenders systematically deny or limit financial services to communities of color—remains entrenched in certain parts of the U.S. Citadel was found to have avoided providing mortgage lending services to Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, focusing instead on predominantly white areas.

The settlement requires Citadel to invest over $6.5 million in impacted communities and is a significant victory in the fight against redlining. It is the first ever redlining lawsuit targeting a credit union and includes funds for subsidizing loan products, outreach to affected neighborhoods, and community development. 

The monetary fine is minimal. It is important to recognize that financial settlements alone cannot erase decades of damage. Discriminatory practices like redlining stifle generational wealth-building opportunities in Black and Hispanic communities, leading to lower rates of homeownership and widening the racial wealth gap.

The effects of redlining are profound. When financial institutions neglect certain neighborhoods, property values stagnate, businesses struggle to thrive, and residents face obstacles in accessing credit. This perpetuates a cycle of poverty and underinvestment that weakens the entire economy. While Citadel’s settlement may provide some relief, it cannot compensate for the decades of exclusion that have left minority communities economically disadvantaged.

The Rocket Mortgage Discrimination Lawsuit

DOJ’s lawsuit against Rocket Mortgage, an appraisal management company, and an appraiser for race discrimination in a mortgage refinance application paints a similarly troubling picture of bias. The complaint alleges that when a Black couple applied to refinance their mortgage, their home was appraised significantly lower than comparable homes owned by white families. This type of discrimination, known as appraisal bias, is a common but often overlooked form of racism in the housing industry.

Appraisal discrimination has severe consequences for minority homeowners. A low appraisal can result in higher mortgage rates, denial of loan applications, or reduced access to home equity—the very means through which families build wealth. In this case, the DOJ’s lawsuit seeks to hold not only the appraiser but also Rocket Mortgage and the appraisal management company accountable, signaling that the government will not tolerate racial bias at any stage of the mortgage process.

The Broader Impact

These cases are part of a broader push by the Biden administration and the DOJ to confront racial inequities in housing and lending. Under the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, discriminatory practices based on race are illegal, yet enforcement has been inconsistent over the years. The recent actions demonstrate a renewed commitment to using the full power of the federal government to hold financial institutions accountable for racial discrimination.

Enforcement, however, is only one part of the solution. Systemic racism in housing and finance cannot be eradicated through lawsuits alone. Structural reforms, including greater oversight of appraisers, mortgage lenders, and financial institutions, are critical. Additionally, expanding access to credit in historically marginalized communities and supporting minority-owned banks and credit unions may help address the racial wealth gap.

The DOJ’s actions are a necessary step forward, but they must be part of a larger, sustained effort to ensure fair housing and lending practices across the nation. It is essential that financial institutions proactively address these issues, adopting policies that prioritize equity and inclusion.

Looking Forward

Both the Citadel settlement and the Rocket Mortgage lawsuit underscore the need for continued vigilance in the fight against racial discrimination in housing. For Black and Hispanic families, homeownership represents one of the most reliable paths to building generational wealth. When discriminatory practices deny them access to that opportunity, the entire economy suffers. Addressing these injustices is not just a matter of fairness—it is an economic imperative.

Both cases should serve as a reminder to all financial institutions that discriminatory practices, whether through redlining or appraisal bias, will not go unnoticed or unpunished. It is up to regulators, lawmakers, and financial leaders to ensure that the American Dream of homeownership is accessible to all, regardless of race. The fight for fair housing continues, and we must all play a role in dismantling the systems that perpetuate inequality.

Popular posts from this blog

Kamalanomics: Home and Health

Vice President Kamala Harris recently unveiled her economic plan, which builds upon and expands several initiatives from the Biden administration while adding new elements aimed at addressing economic challenges faced by American families. Her plan, dubbed the "Opportunity Economy" agenda, focuses on lowering costs for essential goods and services, particularly targeting housing, healthcare, and groceries. Key Components: 1. Housing: Harris proposes constructing three million new homes to address the housing supply crunch, which is more ambitious than Biden's two-million-home plan. She also advocates for a $40 billion "innovation fund" to encourage local governments to find solutions to housing shortages and make it harder for investment companies to buy up large numbers of rental properties, which has driven up rent prices. (See: Comments to the CalPERS Board of Administration, July 15, 2024 on Housing and Environmental Investing.) 2. Healthcare: Expanding on B...

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart...

William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding

September 2018 - 10 Questions William Michael Cunningham on Impact Investing, Blockchain, and Crowdfunding Interview by Carly Schulaka WHO: William Michael Cunningham WHAT: Economist, impact investing specialist, founder of Creative Investment Research WHAT'S ON HIS MIND: “Any finance professional in the U.S. should learn how to create a blockchain.” 1. You are an economist, an inventor, and an impact investing specialist. I’ve heard you say: “True innovation happens in a way that is independent of monetary returns.” How does this statement influence your work? It’s really about finding an interesting problem and applying financial technology to solving that problem or to dealing with that problem. You know, the people who invented the alphabet didn’t do so to make money. They had an interesting problem—communication on both a local and a grand scale—and if you were to calculate the social return for the invention of that technology or technique, it’s almost infinit...