Skip to main content

Charlamagne and DEI. Daniel Merritt, Gonzaga University, Intern.

In a recent episode of the Daily Show, anchor and host Charlamagne expressed a lack of faith in the use of DEI programs in America. Charlamagne explains how he believes DEI is a front for companies to feign diversity-mindsets while maintaining predominantly white employee populations. 

He gives the example of Nike who encourages diversity but has a completely white board of directors. His main qualm with this is that DEI is just serving as corporate PR, even going on to explain how DEI programs can act as evidence in a corporation’s favor when facing a civil rights lawsuit. Charlamagne is warranted in these beliefs; the world of corporate DEI is often lacking integrity and authenticity. Where he is wrong, however, is the conclusions he draws from them. 

      Charlamagne claims that DEI is mostly ‘garbage’. He states that over 900 studies have shown that DEI is ineffective. He does not provide sources for these studies or mention any specifics. (Forbes Magazine noted this inaccuracy: “The voluminous corpus of evidence produced by highly-respected scholars at major research universities, as well as by credible organizations like McKinsey & Company, documents the numerous ways in which DEI benefits businesses. Few academic experts have deemed studies about the positive effects of DEI suspect, certainly not garbage.)” 

Furthermore, all of the clips Charlamagne used in his show to condemn DEI were from one source: Fox News. Given that Fox is known to unfairly condemn diversity initiatives and include heavy bias in their reporting (the network recently paid $800 million after promoting lies about the 2020 presidential election), this seems like a conscious choice by Charlamagne to skew opinion. He also alludes to the idea that the strong DEI programs of companies like Boeing or even the city of Baltimore are partially to blame for the recent tragedies in their operations (the Boeing plane door malfunction and the Baltimore bridge collapse). 

The argument that these bodies were ‘too focused on DEI to consider the implications of these mistakes' is bogus, especially under predominantly white leadership. While the Daily Show host is right to be concerned about DEI’s effectiveness in the workplace, this should prompt discussions of how to improve equity in the corporate environment, not to promote falsehoods and lies. 

Castigating a practice that has proved beneficial for millions of Americans is an unprompted generalization with harmful implications.

Get Bitcoin at https://etoro.tw/3O7fFeW

Popular posts from this blog

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart of

BRICS Summit 2023: Navigating the Transformation of Global Finance

Recent developments in the global financial landscape have captured the attention of the finance world, promising a new era of integration, transformation, and collaboration. Amidst the excitement, however, it is essential to acknowledge the formidable obstacles that stand in the way of realizing these ambitions. The 2023 BRICS Summit , slated to convene amidst this shifting landscape, is poised to be a significant juncture that could have profound implications for the future of international finance. The resurgence of Bitcoin, marked by an impressive, if smaller, year-to-date price surge, has underscored its enduring relevance. Similar concerns surround the exploration of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The UK's digital pound initiative, while forward-looking, raises questions about stability, security, and privacy and potential economic power imbalances. The notion of a BRICS digital currency, potentially extended to include several countries, reflects a desire to chall

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe