Skip to main content

Review of the 2023 State of the Union Speech. Mahlubi Dlamini, ESG Intern, Skidmore College


From a rhetorical perspective, the State of the Union speech by the President of the United States was well-delivered, engaging and had an overall sense of optimism. It seemed the president was on a mission to reassure Americans at home that he is indeed fighting for them, whether against far right Republicans who want to decrease social security spending or against corporations trying to manipulate consumers through “junk fees.” He is there to ensure that neither happens. It was also refreshing to hear the President’s emphasis on bipartisanship going forward, something that will certainly be hard to do in an increasingly polarized Congress.  

Be that as it may, as an international student economist I could not help but wonder about the direction of the United States when it comes to international trade. The president highlighted his commitment to putting America first, a popular domestic narrative most often associated with former president Donald Trump. The Biden administration, has upheld tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on China, which, of course, violate the rules of the World Trade Organization. Will the commitment to put America first exacerbate trade wars with China and with allies like the European Union? It looks like the United States is choosing protectionism over free trade, despite prohibitions embedded international trade laws. 

Finally, while the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) benefits domestic corporations and may help the US government and economy in the transition to greener sources of energy, European companies may be at a disadvantage as they seek to compete against heavily subsidized green US products.   

Get Bitcoin at https://etoro.tw/3O7fFeW

Popular posts from this blog

Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women: A Solution to an Urgent Problem

Maternal mortality is a significant issue in the United States, with Black women disproportionately affected. Research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that Black women are more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts. However, the issue is not new, and despite the increasing amount of data available, the disparities have remained unaddressed for far too long.  Creative Investment Research (CIR) is among the organizations that believe there is a solution to the problem. Through our proposed impact investing vehicle , the Maternal Health Financing Facility for Black Women (MHFFBW), we aim to tackle the mortality gap and support Black women during childbirth, which will, in turn, benefit their communities. The Facility, based on legally binding financing agreements containing terms and conditions that direct resources to individuals and institutions capable of addressing supply-side conditions at the heart of

BRICS Summit 2023: Navigating the Transformation of Global Finance

Recent developments in the global financial landscape have captured the attention of the finance world, promising a new era of integration, transformation, and collaboration. Amidst the excitement, however, it is essential to acknowledge the formidable obstacles that stand in the way of realizing these ambitions. The 2023 BRICS Summit , slated to convene amidst this shifting landscape, is poised to be a significant juncture that could have profound implications for the future of international finance. The resurgence of Bitcoin, marked by an impressive, if smaller, year-to-date price surge, has underscored its enduring relevance. Similar concerns surround the exploration of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The UK's digital pound initiative, while forward-looking, raises questions about stability, security, and privacy and potential economic power imbalances. The notion of a BRICS digital currency, potentially extended to include several countries, reflects a desire to chall

Projected Impact of Gun Laws on Corporate Profits in Texas

More Fortune 500 companies are located in Texas than in any other state. Texas successfully used low taxes and minimal regulations as bait to recruit companies like Tesla and Oracle. The state promoted these “advantages” in ads highlighting their “free-market” environment and criticizing the "tax and spend policies of liberal leadership" in Democrat-run states. Four million people migrated to Texas over the past ten years. Our economic models predict a reversal, however. State of Texas corporations on the Fortune 1000 list generate $2.2 trillion in revenue, $158 billion in profit. They have a market value of $3.8 trillion and employ 2.5 million people nationwide. We continue to believe this increased corporate presence in Texas imposes a tax on the nation as a whole. Texas allows anyone 21 or older to carry handguns without training or licenses, and maintains lower gun purchase age limits. Beyond the recent abortion bill, which allows people to sue those who "aid and abe