Le Nhu Ngoc Tran (Whittier College), Amza Togore (Trinity College) and Riley McGlynn (Siena College) at the US Supreme Court On January 21st, 2026, I and my fellow interns at Creative Investment Research attended Oral Arguments at the Supreme Court of the United States concerning Trump v. Cook. The purpose of the oral arguments was to determine whether Donald Trump's attempts to fire Lisa Cook from her position as Governor of the Federal Reserve were lawful. The defense for this firing rested on allegations of mortgage fraud. My perspective on how the Court operates, and specifically how they operated during this case is that it overall is smooth and straight to the point, getting deep into the case. The Justices asked thorough and relevant questions during the proceeding, while making sure the lawyers appearing before them remained on topic, clear and concise. To give an example, early on during the argument by D. John Sauer the solicitor general and the man defe...
Watching American politics from the outside, it’s easy to hear people asking: how did this happen? How does a billionaire brand himself as anti-elite, win major support among impoverished Hispanic voters he openly targets, and keep pulling poor white working-class Americans into a coalition that always acts against their economic interests? One explanation—outlined in this video —is that voting behavior is frequently driven less by policy and more by emotional and social logic: protection, fear, disgust, hierarchy, and status threat . That framework is useful. But it becomes truly persuasive only when we anchor it in the long-run economic shifts that made these emotions politically usable. This analysis connects that “protector politics” thesis to hard economic data — income stagnation, manufacturing job loss, union decline , and the Black–White median income gap —to show why identity and status narratives keep winning against technocratic policy talk. 1) The Great Pretender/Prote...